Re: Migration Paths for New Modules
- From: Brian Nitz <Brian Nitz Sun COM>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Migration Paths for New Modules
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:00:08 +0100
Shaun McCance wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 13:52 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
Yikes, all right. We should definitely keep the exec_ats key
for legacy. I suppose the Assistive Technology Preferences
dialog should continue to set the old values, if possible,
to keep older machines functioning the same.
I'm not sure what keys are used by the Preferred Applications
dialog. The keys under /desktop/gnome/applications seem to be
obsolete. We could just make six keys: a boolean to enable
each technology, and an exec string for each technology.
Then there's the question of the interface. Would we want to
shunt stuff off to the Preferred Applications dialog? I think
it will be more obvious if it's right in the Assistive Technology
Preferences dialog. So something like
I meant to say something else here, but forgot about it.
What happens if I set my preferred screen reader to Orca
on a fancy new machine, and then try to log into an older
Gnome using the same home directory. We don't have any
sort of fallback mechanism in place.
This problem isn't unique to us, by the way, and it goes as
far back as networked Unix itself. Changing your shell, for
example, can be a real headache on a heterogeneous network
with centrally-managed login information. You won't even be
able to log into a machine without your selected shell.
I don't necessarily have a good solution to this problem.
I can think of some strategies, but none that I think are
much more than a hack.
I know there's been blue-sky talk of a next-generation
configuration system. A general-purpose solution to
problems like these would be a definite selling point
for such a system.
--
Shaun
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
This is one of my biggest headaches in supporting enterprise GNOME
users. Consider these use cases:
1. An ISV creates creates a custom application and wisely chooses to
base this application on GNOME components which won't change between
releases. He creates a launcher for this application in the main menu.
The launcher stops working when GNOME is upgraded. Not a huge problem
for a developer on his laptop, a major headache for a sysadmin of 5,000
desktops.
2. Someone logs into a server running GNOME 2.1X, logs out and logs
into a server running GNOME 2.1.X+2 using the same NFS home directory.
3. Someone logs into a server running GNOME 2.1.X, _doesn't_ log out
and logs into a server running GNOME 2.1.X+2 using the same NFS home
directory. (This can be common on Sun Ray and possibly other thin
client GNOMEs)
Should we say that cases 1-3 won't be supported by GNOME? or...
A simple but incomplete and probably slow solution (hack?) might be to
put the entire home directory under CVS control or on top of a
versioning filesystem and give gdm and gnome session the smarts to
checkout the right branch during login.
Would something like this work instead?:
Move everything off the filesystem into the filesystem independent
configuration database. (this includes .gaim, .evolution,
.gimp,.mozilla, font stuff, desktop files... which means the
configuration database shouldn't be slower than the filesystem.)
The configuration system manages configuration objects which expose
read/write methods based on release, key and migration rules. E.G.
Key :Range :Rule
default_screenreader:2.10-2.14:RW
default_screenreader:2.06-2.14:R
default_screenreader:2.16-2.20:M
The M rule means the migrate methods would be called for releases where
Read or Write are not already defined in the rules.
These methods would take key, version_key and version_now. In this
case, the migrate read method would decide that if default_screenreader
GNOME 2.12 key value is "gnopernicus", and the client is version 2.16,
it returns "orca".
Yeah, I know this idea is only 25% baked, but could it be refined into
something which would improve the user experience?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]