Re: GnomeClient replacement?

["Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>]

On 7/25/06, Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman sun com> wrote:
> Because of build issues I have not been able to test a11y with
> gnome-session HEAD.
>
> Are you telling me that a11y is regressed severely in HEAD, as it
> sounds?

No, I'd have to know whether it was in order to say so.  I just
finally caught up on part of my email and since Havoc was bringing up
a bug from a few months ago (and made it sound less safe than I
thought it was at that time), so I thought I'd comment.

> GTK_MODULES alone will NOT work for the gnome desktop as a whole, since
> libgail-gnome should be selectively included.
>
> Elijah, why didn't you take this to the accessibility-devel-list?

accessibility was cc'ed on the bug (okay, a different alias but
probably close, right?), and my reading of the bug said that it should
be closable as soon as the blocking gtk+ bug was closed.  It was
closed, and had been for a long time.  So, I added a patch and waited
for about two weeks for comment, then just went and committed.  I
really didn't think it'd cause any adverse affects, at least not until
I read Havoc's email yesterday.  After that I wasn't so sure anymore.

*shrug*

Elijah