Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails

[Mike Kestner <mkestner novell com>]

On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:

> These optional builds don't help much, unless people are using gentoo
> (or other source-based distros).
> 
> If the binary package was built with glade support then distros are
> unlikely to change their binary package in the future to remove the
> glade support. That would be an ABI break.

Seems like you're just being argumentative, now.

Is the goal here to reinvent Gtk# in Gtkmm's image, or to satisfy the
requirements of the release set?  Last time I checked, libglade was a
platform library.

-- 
Mike Kestner <mkestner novell com>