Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency



On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:51 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote: 
> Andre Klapper wrote:
> > hejhej,
> > 
> > Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 15:28 -0500 schrieb Havoc Pennington:
> >> Should also get a gtk bug open for it asap so it can start evolving 
> >> toward gtk inclusion, no?
> >>
> >> Maybe there already is one but I didn't see it go by.
> > 
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170782 , i'd say. :-)
> > 
> 
> Indeed, but it doesn't mention GtkUnique (i.e. there's no API proposal 
> on there)

I've opened a new tracker bug:

  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378260

> Maybe gtk-devel is a more appropriate place to start than bugzilla, I 
> don't know. But the point is, if nobody proposes the API for gtk and 
> gets feedback on it from gtk maints then it's pretty much known it won't 
> ever get in gtk!

yeap, probably gtk-devel is better suited for such a discussion.  I'll
send a mail there too.

ciao,
Emmanuele.


-- 
Emmanuele Bassi,  E: ebassi gmail com
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net
B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]