Re: GUnique [Was: gnome-utils branched for GNOME 2.16]



On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 02:12 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 9/22/06, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote:
> > Uhm? Why not use X for IPC?
> 
> *shrug*  I remember that we (Matthias, Vytas, and I) discussed D-Bus,
> Bonobo, and Bacon (since there were several Gnome applications using
> each of those for their single-instance mechanism) and X (which
> Matthias brought up and also since Mozilla/Firefox uses it for its
> single-instance mechanism).  However, I no longer recall any details
> about this particular choice since I was more interested in the WM
> interaction details (surprise, surprise).  It may have been that Vytas
> was familiar with D-Bus and Bacon and we figured it was more important
> to get other details worked out first, but I just don't remember.
> 
> However, Vytas did design GUnique to make the backend easy to
> transparently replace.

One advantage of using X would be that it works for remote X clients
too.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl redhat com    alla lysator liu se 
He's a maverick vegetarian photographer on his last day in the job. She's a 
blind communist hooker who hides her beauty behind a pair of thick-framed 
spectacles. They fight crime! 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]