On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 22:37 +0000, Philip Withnall wrote:
> My poor knowledge of e-d-s' architecture is showing here; I believed it
> stored everything, including e-mail, but apparently it only stores the
> address book, calendar and tasks. However, my point still applies in
> that e-d-s deals with too much, and so is wasteful if you're only using
> the address book. Even so, something's still wrong, as applications
> which use e-d-s for the address book still seem to be storing wrapper
> data themselves. Maybe that's just Pidgin being not-properly-integrated,
> though.
The DBus port of EDS, which I still need to find the time to integrate,
split the calendar and addressbook parts into separate binaries. If you
never use the addressbook code, the daemon isn't even loaded into
memory.
The N800 et al use the DBus port of EDS, and don't even ship the
calendar parts.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: ross burtonini com
jabber: ross burtonini com
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part