Re: Mercurial - Distributed SCM in Gnome (Was: Git vs SVN (was: Can we improve things?))
- From: "Sean Kelley" <svk sweng gmail com>
- To: "Jason D. Clinton" <me jasonclinton com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org, sinzui is verizon net
- Subject: Re: Mercurial - Distributed SCM in Gnome (Was: Git vs SVN (was: Can we improve things?))
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:23:11 -0500
On 9/23/07, Jason D. Clinton <me jasonclinton com> wrote:
> On 9/23/07, Sean Kelley <svk sweng gmail com> wrote:
> > I think GIT is not a very user friendly SCM for those coming from
> > other version control systems. It is far too rough around the edges.
> > Will it get better? I am sure over time it will. But I certainly
> > wouldn't impose it on the multitude of Gnome developers who have
> > varying degress of SCM experience from the git go. :-)
>
>
> I'm a little skeptical that your experience will apply to anyone else
> (except perhaps Nokia and Motorola) based on what I know...
>
Well, if you have software projects that you create, regardless of
whether they are apps or libraries, then that is what I am speaking
to. I need an application that do a certain function for a product
and that leads to a whole slew of completely new software. This is
the where most of the SCM work that deals on a day to day basis with a
version control system.
If you want to learn more about how companies build embedded software
for projects based on the multitude of elements that make up a root
filesystem, then you might read up on Scratchbox, OpenEmbedded, or
Poky.
I am speaking to the former, not the latter which falls under the
scope of what I define as more package management to whatever
packaging system you are using. It involves very little work with
version control.
Sean
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]