Re: Module proposal: GtkGLExt for GNOME 2.22
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Andreas Røsdal <andreasr gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Module proposal: GtkGLExt for GNOME 2.22
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:30:08 +0200
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 19:10 +0200, Andreas R� wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, �3:57 +0200, Andreas R� a �it :
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> * Proposal: Include GtkGLExt in the GNOME developer platform.
> >
> > Oh, interesting.
> >
> > Note that it's possible that it will get rejected for the platform if it
> > doesn't go in the desktop for at least one cycle, since we're quite
> > strict about the platform. So maybe you should propose it for the
> > desktop first?
>
> I'd like to be pragmatic and propose the module to the release set
> which is the most appropriate. Originally, I didn't think that GtkGLExt
> should be a Desktop module, because it doesn't "provide user
> functionality". But now I see that other libraries such as GStreamer,
> gnome-doc-utils and libsoup are included in the Desktop release set as
> well - Despite being development libraries, and not providing end user
> functionality.
Those modules are in the Desktop release set because they are
dependencies of applications that are also in that release set.
They don't offer any particular guarantees of API/ABI stability, or any
promise that you won't need to port to a new version of the API in the
near future, though some of them aren't too bad. There would be
something odd about saying "Here's a new API for you to use. We don't
recommend that you use it."
I'd much rather see this done properly in GTK+.
> Since GtkGLExt is a development library, and should be part
> of the infrastructure / development platform for other modules, the
> developer platform was originally the release set that I thought would be
> most appropriate.
>
> So I'm fine with proposing GtkGLExt as a desktop module, at least for the
> first development cycle. Generally, more long-term, I think that all
> development libraries in the desktop release set should be in the
> developer platform release set, ideally.
>
> >> However, GtkGLExt is currently unmaintained. I will volunteer to maintain
> >> it if accepted as a GNOME module, and hope to work with the GNOME community
> >> to make it fit in well as a GNOME module.
> >
> > Well, it won't be accepted if it's unmaintained. So you should do things
> > the other way around: start maintaining it before it can get accepted.
>
> I agree. Should I begin maintaining it in the GNOME infrastructure already
> now? Any suggestions about how to proceed during this development cycle
> for a "smooth" inclusion as a new module during this cycle? :-)
>
> >> There has also been a lot of discussion about this in bug #119189
> >> "Add OpenGL support to GTK+".
> >
> > I gave a really quick look at the bug, and there doesn't seem to be any
> > decision there. Are there any specific plans?
>
> There are no decisions or specific plans that I know of yet.
>
> - Andreas
> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list gnome org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]