Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.22
- From: Xavier Bestel <xavier bestel free fr>
- To: Martyn Russell <martyn imendio com>
- Cc: Sven Herzberg <herzi gnome-de org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.22
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:12:29 +0200
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 10:03 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >>> Right, libempathy and libemapthy-gtk are GPL because it contains
> >>> code from Gossip. libempathy mostly contains trivial code from
> >>> gossip,
> >>>
> >>> the rest is rewritten by me or some collabora workers who
> >>> are 100% OK to relicence, so it shouldn't be a problem to
> >>> relicence libempathy to LGPL. libempathy-gtk is more a problem
> >>> since lots of non-trivial code is written by Gossip developers
> >>> who doesn't seems to agree to relicence to LGPL...
> >>
> >> I'm getting slightly tired of you Xavier, again.
> >>
> >> What are you basing this on? I for one haven't been asked at all
> >> regarding this topic.
> >
> > I asked Martyn's opinion long ago, I know he is not the only person
> > to decide but he wasn't for the relicencing.
>
> Rob basically summed it up perfectly.
>
> I have to say, I agree with Mikael, this is just not true. Empathy looks
> EXACTLY like Gossip for the most part, most of the widgets have taken
> years to write. To say that the code you use is trivial is insulting.
Xavier Claessens wrote *exactely the opposite* when he said that
"libempathy-gtk is more a problem since lots of non-trivial code is
written by Gossip developers". So you are in fact in violent agreement.
> I wouldn't re-license it mostly because of the way you have been with us
> Xavier. There is a way of treating people and I think you would have got
> more from us if you had remembered that.
Looks like there are decisions made because of anger.
Xav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]