Re: Reduced Bugzilla functionality for 6+ months -- acceptable?

[Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>]

On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 06:42:36PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le jeudi 04 décembre 2008, à 17:00 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> > Is above acceptable?
> 
> The current situation is a dead-end, so I'm all for moving, even if we
> lose some stuff.

Yeah, but I need to know:
 * what priority should the missing stuff get (to determine order of
   work)
 * what is critical (e.g. affects GNOME release if missing for more than
   at most 4 weeks)

Missing functionality ok, causing 2.26 to suck is not.

-- 
Regards,
Olav