Re: State of gvfs in Gnome 2.21

[Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the
> gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if needed. Obviously,
> releasing Nautilus with too many or some big regressions is not a good
> plan.

More for release-team to decide, not d-d-l. Devs should code.

> Personally, I'm more in favor of postponing the gvfs-based Nautilus
> because delaying our release can bring more problems for us and for
> the projects relying on our schedule.

Postponing nautilus means postponing everything.

> Hence, it would be good:
> - to have a plan with the list of regressions we can't accept for 2.22

That is the showstopper list by Andre.

> - to hear (mainly) from Alex if this plan is feasible

Just need more development work on missing features.

-- 
Regards,
Olav