2008-01-21 klockan 23:10 skrev Olav Vitters:
> 4. It is not as extensible as that Turtle/RDF format (main objection)..
> e.g. with the mailing lists, at one point I might think about some field
> that says 'this is the devel list'.. in the beginning I might just check
> for something simple, e.g.
> 1 mailing list --> devel list
> 2+ mailing lists --> whatever has 'devel' in the name
> fallback: 1st mentioned mailing list
> but that logic might break down and could be too confusing (never sure
> how it is parsed).
This issue can be easily solved by adding a custom property:
(gnome:development-list, rdfs:subPropertyOf, doap:mailing-list)
This property then serves as a "specialization" of doap:mailing-list.
Things like "first mentioned" is not going to work in RDF---the description
is unordered after parsing (and serialization may print it in any order).
mvrgr, Wouter
--
:wq mail uws xs4all nl
web http://uwstopia.nl
we'd drink and get high until late :: and now we're all alone -- placebo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature