Re: gnome-session proposal



Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 19:35 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 01:08 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > David Zeuthen wrote:
> > 
> > > > Yes we do; at least I believe so.  I won't complain about my xterms as
> > > > they may be considered a legacy application but modern applications
> > > > written for the other major free desktop should not be left in the
> > > > cold.
> > > 
> > > Do you have a concrete example of a modern desktop application where the
> > > absence of XSMP in GNOME 2.24 would be a huge inconvenience?
> > 
> > I think you should not limit yourself to GNOME 2.24; people are using
> > other applications.
> 
> Uh, I think you misread what I said. I was asking for examples of modern
> desktop applications (e.g applications using e.g. Qt, GTK+, Swing, SWT,
> E17, wxWidgets, XUL etc.) for which absence of XSMP would be a huge
> inconvenience. Do you have any such examples?

Openoffice.org ?

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
Mandriva



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]