Re: (L)GPLv3



El mar, 06-07-2010 a las 12:32 -0500, Ted Gould escribió:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:17 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> > It's the GPLv2 in the program code that states "you can't link this 
> > against anything other than GPLv2 code".
> > 
> > Nothing we could add to the library licence (other than dual-licensing
> > under GPLv2) could fix this.
> 
> [...] But, it seems like when we're making a choice between dual-licensing
> v2/3 and v3 with an exception for v2 only -- the exception is the better choice.

Not an expert, but if I understood Ryan correctly, it's v2 which would
need the exception ("This program is licenced under GPL v2 only, but you
may link this against anything (L)GPL regardless of version")

Florian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]