Re: Again: please clarify the decision on IBus integration
- From: Aron Xu <aronxu gnome org>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Again: please clarify the decision on IBus integration
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:58:51 +0800
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 18:25 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 17:56 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 01:40 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Ma Xiaojun <damage3025 gmail com> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi, Aron Xu
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I've got some of your points through your last post.
>> >> >> > It's a topic worth discussing.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Can you share your ~/.config/jhbuildrc so all of us can talk about the
>> >> >> > same things?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sorry I'm not building GNOME by hand right now, so no good jhbuildrc
>> >> >> for you to share. I believe there are many people build it and they
>> >> >> can help you.
>> >> >
>> >> > Did you actually test any of the code that Rui and other platform
>> >> > developers worked on?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> The changes are simple to read, have you read the patches before
>> >> asking me such a question?
>> >
>> > I'm the one reviewing those patches for inclusion in
>> > gsettings-desktop-schemas, gnome-settings-daemon, and
>> > gnome-control-center.
>> >
>> > Yes, I've read the patches. I'm guessing you haven't read or tested any
>> > of the updated patches posted in Bugzilla then, otherwise you'd have
>> > seen my name.
>> >
>>
>> No, I'm not following Bugzilla closely, but the patch reviews are just
>> removing racy stuff and try to avoid mistakes in the very detail
>> implementations. But do you understand here we have an architectural
>> problem and what I'm talking about aren't about the patch quality?
>
> The architecture is the same that we had before, except that GNOME bits
> are handling the configuration storage, and application.
>
> This is the way we apply settings for every user-wide setting.
>
Did you read and understand what I've replied to Rui?
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]