Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+

[Carlos Soriano <csoriano protonmail com>]

The project, not everyfile. It's more like accepting that Nautilus is gpl3+ now since some files are gpl3+ already. That's what I mean by re licensing.

Best,

Carlos Soriano

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+

Local Time: May 25, 2017 12:36 PM

UTC Time: May 25, 2017 10:36 AM

From: swilmet gnome org

To: Carlos Soriano <csoriano protonmail com>

desktop-devel-list gnome org <desktop-devel-list gnome org>

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:10:56AM -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:

> I still get different opinions from different people on that. But that

> makes sense to me. Probably makes sense to relicense the files too at

> some point, but that would be a later decision.

> Do you know any advantage of relicensing the files themselves?

Well, I thought you wanted to license Nautilus as GPLv3+, that's the

topic of this thread…

See:

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v3HowToUpgrade

--

Sébastien