Re: [Evolution] PGP/Encryption? (and X.509)
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Michael Gerdts <Michael Gerdts usa alcatel com>
- Cc: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>, evolution helixcode com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] PGP/Encryption? (and X.509)
- Date: 07 Mar 2001 13:48:45 -0500
Why is it not okay to use libnss from Mozilla? libnss means that we can
have cleaner code and it'd probably be more secure as well.
If the OpenSSL guys ever change the license to be GPL compatable, then
I'll consider using it. Otherwise the answer will remain "no".
Jeff
On 07 Mar 2001 08:28:17 -0500, Michael Gerdts wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:31:36AM +1030, Not Zed wrote:
We cannot use openssl due to licensing, we are going to use NSS instead.
However, S/MIME is to be worked on very soon at least.
It depends on how it is implemented... If all the functionality is
implemented as calls into openssl's crypto library (or other source), then
this is an issue.
If if the openssl command is used, I don't think that it is an issue. That
is, evolution should be free to do the equivalent of
system("openssl x509 ...")
Right?
I have no reason to prefer one implementation over the other. I just want
the functionality.
Mike
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - evolution helixcode com
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]