Re: [Evolution] Replying to spam

[Pete Biggs <pete biggs org uk>]

> > > Andre, it's better, if we don't reply to spam, to enable easier and more
> > > secure filtering of junk mails.
> >
> > I think it's not better per se, and I missed the implementation details
> > of "enabling easier and more secure filtering" here...
>
> It could happen that replying to spam will increase the false rejection
> and/or false accept rate.
To be honest I think the level of non-caught spam I get just from
posting to this list (or any public list) far outweighs the noise
associated with replying to spam here! :-)

P.