On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 17:37, Jeff Waugh wrote: > <quote who="Daniel Veillard"> > > > No problem, I wasn't objecting to publishing it, just pointing out > > it wasn't really a by-laws change. > > We should count the number of people objecting the change. I think > > it's 5 or 6 so far. I don't know precisely the membership size, probably > > around 350 that would mean 18 person asking for a vote to force it, > > maybe someone from the election comitee has the numbers. > > It would also be reasonable to wait for a proposed voting system. I would > only be happy with anonymous voting if the system was sufficiently secure > and reliable, and I imagine that's a pretty strong sentiment amongst the > membership. I believe the number of people supporting the change by posting a message on the list is also in the 5 to 6 range, probably less if we discount board members. Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part