Re: Licensing and copyright
- From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm poure com>
- To: rms gnu org
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Licensing and copyright
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:57:05 +0100
Dear Richard,
Thank you for your answers. I will not be able to answer other emails to stop
posting to the list.
> For practical decisions, it makes more sense to decide
> based on the outcomes that are likely to happen.
You are right. Just another example [there are numerous of them]:
With Gnome being installed in future BIOS within 10 years, the statistics for
a potential problem (ex: physical injury) in the U.S.A. is closer to one
rather than zero.
Even after assignment, the original author may have to show-up in court.
> The pros and cons of concentrating ownership in a single entity (be it
> the FSF) and in a single country (be it the United-States) need to be
> studied in more details. Probably by a professor in law.
> Professor Moglen has studied them, and our policies are based on his
> advice.
I am not opposed to the GPL, only to an assignment under the American laws.
Does Professor Moglen advice to concentrate ownership of free softwares under
the umbrella of the American laws? Does he study the liabilities of non-US
residents?
Any link?
http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu
Again, I am only asking for a more precise HOWTO that would take into account
all legal aspects of an assignment for non-US residents, not only copyright
enforcement.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]