Re: Garnome 0.20?
- From: Janina Sajka <janina rednote net>
- To: Thomas Ward <slingshooter valkyrie net>
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Garnome 0.20?
- Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 10:32:01 -0500
This closely mirrors my experience, though my error haas to do with the
AT-SPI package version. I've been too busy to chase this down.
My question is this--Has anyone built Gnopernicus on GNOME 2.2? Or
is everyone using the 2.1 development version still, in which case the
Red Hat rawhide Phoebe might prove closer?
Thomas Ward writes:
> From: Thomas Ward <slingshooter valkyrie net>
>
>
> Hi, I'm beginning to wonder if everythime compiled ok when I built gnome
> 2.2 with garnome 0.20.
> I modified the export variables Mark gave me the other day, and gnome-mag
> and gnome-speech compiles, and works fine.
> However, when I tried to build gnopernicus it screams at me that my
> versions of libxml, glib, and libgnome are not met.
> I'm assuming they were installed when the garnome scripts were used, and
> would have to be inorder to build gnome 2.2.
> Yet, when it looks for the libs it says glib 1.3, glib 2.0 not met, etc.
> Any ideas on this? Anyone built gnopernicus using garnome0.20?
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
--
Janina Sajka, Director
Technology Research and Development
Governmental Relations Group
American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
Email: janina afb net Phone: (202) 408-8175
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]