Re: Garnome 0.20?

[Thomas Ward <slingshooter valkyrie net>]

In my case AT-Spi compiled fine. The compile dies out on another 
package.However, at the moment i can't remember which one it was.


On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Janina Sajka wrote:

> This closely mirrors my experience, though my error haas to do with the
> AT-SPI package version. I've been too busy to chase this down.
> My question is this--Has anyone built Gnopernicus on GNOME 2.2? Or
> is everyone using the 2.1 development version still, in which case the
> Red Hat rawhide Phoebe might prove closer?
> 
> 
> Thomas Ward writes:
> > From: Thomas Ward <slingshooter valkyrie net>
> > 
> > 
> > Hi, I'm beginning to wonder if everythime compiled ok when I built gnome 
> > 2.2 with garnome 0.20.
> > I modified the export variables Mark gave me the other day, and gnome-mag 
> > and gnome-speech compiles, and works fine.
> > However, when I tried to build gnopernicus it screams at me that my 
> > versions of libxml, glib, and libgnome are not met.
> > I'm assuming they were installed when the garnome scripts were used, and 
> > would have to be inorder to build gnome 2.2.
> > Yet, when it looks for the libs it says glib 1.3, glib 2.0 not met, etc.
> > Any ideas on this? Anyone built gnopernicus using garnome0.20?
> > Thanks.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> > gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
> 
>