Re: StarOffice accessible
- From: Malte Timmermann <Malte Timmermann sun com>
- To: Jacob Schmude <jacobs surferie net>
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: StarOffice accessible
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:58:34 GMT
Jacob,
thanks for this information, hope to hear more from your Accessibility
experience with StarOffice/OpenOffice.
Malte.
PS: IMHO you shouldn't need SAL_ACCESSIBILITY_ENABLED=1 for this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 28.06.2003, 00:56:53, Jacob Schmude <jacobs surferie net> wrote
regarding StarOffice accessible:
> Hi all
> Further to trying to make openoffice 1.1 beta 2 work with gnopernicus, I
> decided to try staroffice 6.1 beta 2. Openoffice and staroffice are very
> similar, in fact, I think openoffice was a spin-off version of staroffice
> (correct me if I'm wrong on this). At any rate, once the variable
> SAL_ACCESSIBILITY_ENABLED=1 was set, everything from the installation
> onward was accessible, though some funny things happened. These things
also
> happened when running the applications after installation. First,
something
> must happen to keyboard input that does something to gnopernicus. For
> instance, keyboard echo does not work. However, what I'm typing appears
on
> my powerbraille just fine. A similar thing happens to the keypad, I can't
> use the keypad. However, braille review keys work as they should, and I
can
> emulate the keypad using them. Odd. The only other thing I've noticed as
> that gnopernicus crashes when trying to enter data in the spreadsheet.
> However, it's gnopernicus which seems to have the problem here. Apart
from
> these bugs, staroffice 6.1 beta 2 seems quite useable, and is more
> accessible than openoffice 1.1 beta 1 was. So for those having trouble
with
> the latest openoffice, give staroffice a shot. Just thought I'd let
> everyone know my findings here.
> HTH
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]