RE: Text editors
- From: Christopher Atlee <catlee isgtec com>
- To: "'Maximilien Lincourt'" <max toonboom com>
- Cc: "'gnome-devel-list gnome org'" <gnome-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: Text editors
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:37:29 -0400
What I was thinking was providing a set of CORBA components. You could have
an nedit component, a vim component and an emacs component. Then users
could choose which they wanted to use on a global basis and on a
per-application basis. And since all the components support the same
interface, you can interchange them without a problem. I certainly wouldn't
want to use vim for writing an email, but I would like to use vim for coding
or writing up HTML pages.
Assuming the interfaces for the components are designed well, you could then
have a gnome spell checker which could spell-check any text contained in one
of these components.
Cheers,
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maximilien Lincourt [SMTP:max@toonboom.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 1999 4:28 PM
> To: Christopher Atlee
> Cc: 'gnome-devel-list@gnome.org'
> Subject: Re: Text editors
>
> Christopher Atlee wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> >
> > Would it not make sense for these programs to make use of a common text
> > editor instead of providing their own?
>
> Yes it does, but for now, there's no real editor that is easy to use
> and powerfull for the ordinary user and that have the GPL or
> any acceptable licensing available; the one I would prefer is
> still nedit, but the licensing is not quite ready; or acceptable
> to the general GNU community.
>
>
> > I was thinking that it would be great if I could use a componentized
> version
> > of vim in any application that needed a text editor.
>
> I don't think that using a vi clone, or a emacs clone as a
> standardized
> editor is a good idea, remember that we may be using gnome and, for
> most
> of us, we are in the "programming" business or in the hacking
> ( in good sense of the word ) hobby, but if the goal of the gnome
> community is to offer an alternative to commercial OSes, we have to
> be sure that the tools that are included in the packages must be
> dummy proof and easy to use without leaving to options to let
> more advance users use the tools to their fullest.
>
> The editor wars is one of the more important one ( I think )
> on the GNU/Linux front, I remember when I started using Unix,
> the only editor available was vi, and emacs, I used to have a
> hell of a time just using those tools; but it's my jobs and I
> had to learn those tools to be effective.
>
> but if I have to propose linux and gnome to my mother and the
> first thing she wants to do is send an Email to someone, and
> she is presented with vi ( or emacs ) she will turn around and
> not look at linux again. that's why I don't believe the use of
> vi clone or emacs clone are the way to go.
>
> Remember that creating software, is not only for us
> "geek/nerd/hacker/developer" but also for the general
> public ( and your mom ! ).
>
>
> Also , I still agree with the original idea to have one
> editor "widget" for most gnome tasks the require and editor,
> and that it should offer the possibility to be easy to use and
> powerfull enough for everyone.
>
> Max.
>
> --
> Maximilien Lincourt, B. info., Software developer
> mailto:max@toonboom.com http://www.toonboom.com << File: Card for
> Maximilien Lincourt >>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]