Re: libart antialiasing problem
- From: Lyndon Drake <lyndon stat auckland ac nz>
- To: Raph Levien <raph onan artofcode com>
- Cc: Lyndon Drake <lyndon stat auckland ac nz>, gnome-devel-list <gnome-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: libart antialiasing problem
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 18:49:31 +1300
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 09:26:57PM -0800, Raph Levien wrote:
> Fortunately, if you have a need to work with vector paths not
> satisfying these constraints, libart has functions (in art_svp_wind)
> to fiddle with winding numbers. This slows things down a bit (which is
> why it's not done by default), and currently these functions are not
> 100% robust.
Thanks for the info. This will help a lot.
I hesitate to ask, but what exactly does "not 100% robust" mean? As in it
crashes, or just doesn't quite work properly.
--
Lyndon Drake | Desktop: http://www.gnome.org
isenguard | Mail client: http://www.mutt.org
ICQ#: 12558803 | Editor: http://www.vim.org
http://stat.auckland.ac.nz/~lyndon | OS: http://www.linux.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]