More on *.defs

Paolo Molaro <> wrote:
> Well, the canonical file should be in the gtk+ sources, but I doubt this
> is the case nowadays.  A pretty much updated version souhld be in the
> sources of the gtk guile bindings as well as the per/gtk bindings.  As
> the format of the .defs file is not currently satisfactory for all the
> uses we found for it, we should probably get toghether and define a
> standard that suits all our needs so that we can all use the canonical
> version, whatever that will be.

This sounds like a good idea. I've been able to parse the various *.defs
files without any problems, but it's hard to make useable bindings from

What shortcomings have you discovered in the *.defs files?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]