Re: Gnome panel and configuration system
- From: Antonio Campos <acampos ceronet com>
- To: "gnome-devel-list gnome org" <gnome-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gnome panel and configuration system
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 19:07:27 +0100
Antonio Campos wrote:
> Bob Phan wrote:
>
> > Antonio Campos wrote:
> > >
> > > I was thinking the other day how to minimize some efforts that are being
> > > put in gnome and linux in general, and I came to some ideas I want to share.
> > >
> > > Why have a menu editor in the panel? I think the correct way to go is
> > > letting gmc make a lot of the hard work for the applications. I mean
> > > that the menues should be only entries in a directory, and the submenues
> > > or icons only have to be directories or applications links into these
> > > directories (the way Microsoft does it with Windows). So, when an user
> > > wants to add or delete a menu entry, the only thing to need to do is to
> > > edit he directory structure through gmc. If you want to modify the
> > > menues, simply start gmc into the directory that holds the menues
> > > structure (example: .gnome/panel/menues).
> > Check out /usr/share/gnome/apps and ~username/.gnome/apps
> >
> > >
> > > Another idea for a more "easy linux" (let me know if it is a good or bad
> > > one):
> > > I know this should go to the linuxconf team, but I think this is very
> > > related to gnome.
> > > Why have a linuxconf application, when you can have a directory
> > > structure that holds little controls that modify the computer
> > > configuration?
> > A good idea, in theory, but not everyone uses gnome, and even less use
> > linuxconf. Personally, i never use gmc, i find bash a much better
> > alternative (but that's my opinion). Everything that is configurable is
> > configurable through its respective daemon or application, there is no
> > central 'control panel' for linux (although linuxconf tries to create
> > one). It would be possible (maybe even beneficial) to do something like
> > this for gnome users. But the problem would be that it would be limited
> > to gmc users. And as long as alot of ppl prefer to use vim for most of
> > their system configuration editing, i don't think this model will change
> > too soon, although i could be wrong.
> >
> > --
> > /*
> > * Bob Phan <ex-freek@yahoo.com, rphan@nrgn.com>
> > *
> > * Computer Programmer
> > * Neurogen Corp.
> > * Branford, CT 06405
> > *
> > */
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
> > Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
> This configuration system is not oriented only for gmc. Every hard disk browser
> could use it (gmc, kfm for kde, even bash for terminal lovers...), because the
> idea is to make the configuration of the distint parts of the system based on
> little executable components (that may even execute on command line).
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]