RE: gtkhtml

["Chris Jones" <chris black-sun co uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi

> In the long term Mozilla is probably better since it supports lots
more
> stuff like stylesheets, DOM, DHTML, XML etc. So I'm not sure how
much
> effort to put into gtk-xmhtml.

I would suggest that it depends on how much memory a mozilla widget is
going to use - gtkxmhtml as it is is quite low footprint and I
wouldn't want to sacrifice megs of RAM just for some capabilities that
I probably wouldn't actually use in the widget (ie the CSS, DOM, etc.)


- ---
 _____ _         _       _____
| __  | |___ ___| |_ ___|   __|_ _ ___        Chris "Ng" Jones
| __ -| | .'|  _| '_|___|__   | | |   |  chris@black-sun.co.uk
|_____|_|__,|___|_,_|   |_____|___|_|_|    www.black-sun.co.uk
            S o f t w a r e

 "Linux is beating Windows" - David Cole, Microsoft Executive

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.3i for non-commercial use <http://www.pgpi.com>

iQA/AwUBOA7/p5hmBipjerS3EQIjrwCePuxH4KfKR26MXU66DlGdYEV5gL8AoLlC
yw1Cr2v/DZ8/n5Ts1AO0VjF5
=Kant
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----