Re: Why GTK+ vs. GNOME?
- From: Sean Middleditch <sean middleditch iname com>
- To: Evan Martin <eeyem u washington edu>, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Why GTK+ vs. GNOME?
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 19:19:58 -0400
Evan Martin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 17:37:11 -0400, Sean Middleditch said:
> > OK, this is really naive question, but its been on my mind...
> >
> > For the developers who don't want to use GNOME libraries, but DO want to
> > use GTK+, what is your main reason for not wanting GNOME?
>
> Do you use KDE?
> If you don't, would you install KDE to use KDE apps?
> ..I wouldn't.
I use Mandrake. They all but force KDE on you. So I suppose I never really
looked at it that way, since I assumed most people would have both anyways...
See, I told you it was naive question. ~,^
> GTK is required (unless you want to use Xlib... ugh) to make an X
> application; GNOME is bells and whistles in many cases.
Understood.
> I'm all for GNOME, too, but I know that many people won't install it
> for the same reason I won't install KDE. I don't lose anything by
> using GTK.
OK.
So, would you install Qt then for a Qt-only app? Or GTK+ for GTK+ only app,
if you didn't have GTK+? I mean, same thing, really, isn't it? Except
GNOME is a little bigger... ~,^
> --
> Evan Martin - eeyem@u.washington.edu
> http://students.washington.edu/eeyem
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]