Re: More Political Stuff
- From: Sean Middleditch <sean middleditch iname com>
- To: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: More Political Stuff
- Date: 26 Aug 2000 21:19:43 +0500
> On 25 Aug 2000, Sean Middleditch wrote:
>
> > > I'm curious to hear what has been rushed, in your opinion.
> >
> > In a few years, an awesome desktop has been put together. So many
> > features, libraries, etc. have been created for an excellent desktop and
> > development. But a lot of the flaws I see, a lot of the design issues
> > that we are reworking (replacing gmc, goad, etc.) I feel like it was
> > rushed, and we might not have to be replacing so much right now but
> > instead developing a rock-solid system. Instead we're spending a lot of
> > time right now fixing a lot of old design flaws, replacing them with
> > better architectures that would allow us to make REALLY nifty stuff in a
> > year or so... but if we had slowed down a tad bit, and not made of the
> > design flaws we had, perhaps we could have been doing the nifty stuff in
> > only a month or two... sort of.. see my point? Now that i've woken up I
> > think I've lost it...
>
> You're on crack. :)
>
I thought someone's been putting something strangen my food... ~,^
> The reason things like GOAD and GMC are getting replaced is not because
> they were rushed initially, but because we now have the experience to know
> better.
>
> For example, GOAD definitely wasn't rushed, but there is NO way I could
> have ever hoped to make OAF suck as little as it does without having
> endured a year of GOAD's limitations. I'm sure in a year or two, OAF will
> need replacing or revamping with an even better solution (I already know
> of a possible problem or two that has caught my eye).
>
Hmm, my old 'mentor' always said that careful planning would ensure that
you could get things right, and I've followed that rule very much; most
systems I design AFTER sitting down and thinking about them turn out
very well. Its the ones I rush through that I always end up rewriting..
> At the time, GMC seemed like a very good idea - we would get to reuse code
> from mc and build a nice file manager - but we learned about the other
> problems once things were in a working state.
>
That makes more sense, I suppose.
> The problem is not that things were rushed, but that it is impossible to
> produce a perfect design without infinite experience, and humans are
> neither perfect nor infinite.
Are you saying I'm not perfect? ~,^
Alright, you win, I rushed to the conclusion... I'm afraid I do that a
little more than I should for my own good.
Sean Etc.
> -- Elliot
> DEAR IRS, Please cancel my subscription.
>
>
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]