Re: Fonts and readability
- From: "Sergey I. Panov" <sipan mit edu>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: "Sergey I. Panov" <sipan mit edu>, Derek Simkowiak <dereks kd-dev com>, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Fonts and readability
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:06:22 -0500
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 11:55:24PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> "Sergey I. Panov" <sipan@mit.edu> writes:
>
> > MS freely downloadable TT fonts collection? Is there some licensing
> > problem? They do cover all the common scripts and styles.
>
> - They aren't modifiable
> - They aren't redistributable
> - Microsoft could pull them from distribution at any time.
>
> Also, I don't believe that they have CJK fonts as part of their
> collection, but I could be wrong.
>
> But in any case, you can't build a free system where the essential
> component is a proprietary product from a company competing against
> free software.
Then we need font editor. Commercial font editors (just two decent
font editor are on the market) are >$300. I read a few articles
about METAFONT script -> TT/T1 transformation. Unfortunatly your need
fonteditor to define hints at the last stage. There are also some
tools available, that let you design METAFONT scripts using xfig. I
guess it is theoretically possible to turn some free vector drawing
program into a font editor (?with METAFONT based automation?).
> - Better metrics - this includes lots of stuff - kerning tables,
> positioning information for diacriticals, baseline adjustment
> information.
>
> - Better ways to deal with subset fonts. It's painful to get the
> information about what characters are in a subset font
> out of X currently.
>
> - Better font matching capabilities
>
> - Ability to deal with alternate glyphs for characters.
>
> - Ability to draw rotated glyph strings.
And you want to have all that without bypassing X (font descr. files
-- .afm and some extra info if needed )?
Regards,
Sergey
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]