Re: GNOME 1.1.90
- From: Kenny Graunke <graunke teleport com>
- To: kenneth gnome dk
- Cc: gnome-hackers nuclecu unam mx, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 1.1.90
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 09:21:31 -0700
Sounds good to me...
--Kenny : )
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 03:03:54PM +0200, kenneth@gnome.dk wrote:
>
> Regarding gdm2. Most people/developers/distributions are using gdm2beta4,
> but this release suffers if we take translations into account. This is
> often very stupid since the cvs version is pretty well translated.
>
> My idea is that we release a gdm2beta45, which is gdm2beta4 with the most
> common (non distribution specific) patches.
>
> Then we branch this one in cvs, and let the translators merge their gdm2
> cvs translations with the branched version. Then we give the translators a
> couple of days to make sure that it is 100% translated, and then we
> release gdm2beta5 from the gdm2beta45 branch
>
> Comments?
>
> Kenneth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]