Re: Heated agreement? (was) Re: Canvas shortcomings
- From: Mark <jamess1 wwnet net>
- To: Martin Sevior <msevior mccubbin ph unimelb edu au>
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Lauris Kaplinski <lauris ximian com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Gustavo João Alves Marques Carneiro <ee96090 fe up pt>, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Heated agreement? (was) Re: Canvas shortcomings
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:55:21 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Martin Sevior wrote:
>
> It seems to me that we're in heated agreement that there should be a set
> of virtual primitive functions that call arbitary backend graphics
> contexts. Right?
>
Well, I posted some messages too, so I don't know if the debate was
limited to three points of view in total agreement.
I'm not sure why this is on a public list. Why don't you three e-mail each
other and figure out a solution. The general feeling I get from this
discusion is one of insolence and volutary ignorance.
Mark
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
