Re: A text every GNOME programmer should read.
- From: Shlomi Fish <shlomif vipe technion ac il>
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: A text every GNOME programmer should read.
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:53:19 +0300 (IDT)
On 22 May 2001, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
> If you are a programmer, I would like to encourage you to read the
> following article. It is called `UI Design for Programmers':
>
> http://joel.editthispage.com/stories/storyReader$51
>
> One of the best pieces of text I have read.
>
Well, it's quite long, but I scanned through it and it should make a very
good read. However, GNOME does not comply to everything Joel says there.
For instance, I always found the lack of keyboard functionality in
Gtk+/GNOME frustrating and he talks extensively about proper keyboard
integration.
I have yet to find a GNOME dialog which I can operate without a mouse, and
Nautilus does not seem to have one keyboard binding present "for the sake
of medicine". In KDE, the situation is much better and I think GNOME
should follow suit.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
BTW, do we have a SillySounds directory where Miguel de Icaza says "Hi! My
name is Miguel de Icaza and I pronounce GNOME as GNOME."? (In English
and Spanish) There are any number of ways to pronounce GNOME:
1. Nome (that's how I pronounce it because it is the proper English
pronouncation of the word "gnome".)
2. gg-nome (the common Israeli paradigm for pronouncing it)
3. Gah-nome (I read somewhere that it should be pronounced that way)
4. Jee-nome (Ditto)
So it will be intersting to know how GNOME's project head pronounces it.
> Best wishes,
> Miguel.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devel-list mailing list
> gnome-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devel-list
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish shlomif vipe technion ac il
Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/
Home E-mail: shlomif techie com
A more experienced programmer does not make less bugs. He just realizes
what went wrong more quickly.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]