Re: extended zvt widget

On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 16:29, Bill Haneman wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 23:27, Cristiano De Michele wrote:
> ...
> > 
> > > It would be nice as Jacob says to get a separate patch for each issue
> > > being fixed, ideally...
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure I have time to maintain libzvt at all, so I'm kind of
> > > hoping maybe Jacob can review the patches... I'm really really
> > > definitely not the lizvt maintainer. ;-)
> > > 
> > > My .02 is that it's risky to apply any patch to HEAD which isn't
> > > fixing a showstopper bug.
> > > 
> > > Havoc
> > 
> > sadly I think I'll have no time to separate all bugs
> > as J. suggested, and I think it's quite boring too and
> > maybe not feasible because I, as I said, I rewrote a lot of
> > things...
> That's too bad.  However Cristiano, did you notice the accessibility
> code in libzvt when you were working on it, and did you check to see if
> it still worked after your changes?  That's something that would need to
> be confirmed before applying any changes to libzvt.
> best regards,
> -Bill
Hi Bill,
I used profterm with my patched applied without any problem and 
I also run vttest inside profterm having no problem, 
should I do anything specific to test accessibility with my patches?
...I could give you some more infos on my patches of course
but split them in separate bugs it's not feasible and even
meaningless IMHO what's your opinio about? what should I do?

						regards Cristiano

  Cristiano De Michele,
  Department of Physics,
  University "Federico II" of Naples

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]