RE: GNOME, .Net and Mono

[Franck Martin <Franck sopac org>]

I think the problem is not with evolution but with orbit, which sometimes
has trouble finding running instances or launching new programs...

The newer versions of orbit are more and more efficient...

Franck Martin
Network and Database Development Officer
SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission
Fiji
E-mail: franck sopac org <mailto:franck sopac org> 
Web site: http://www.sopac.org/
<http://www.sopac.org/> Support FMaps: http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/
<http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/> 

This e-mail is intended for its addresses only. Do not forward this e-mail
without approval. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be necessarily
the views of SOPAC.



-----Original Message-----
From: iain [mailto:iain ximian com]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2002 12:16 
To: Tomasz Kloczko
Cc: Sean Middleditch; gnome-devel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: GNOME, .Net and Mono




> but on my system it seems it statrs slewer than gnumeric. Do you know
> something about how to speedup startup time application like Evolution ?
> What is still neccessary ? I'm look few times inside Evolutions and I'm
> impressed good level modularization but still .. it is slow. Maybe it need
> still some work on ground ORB* level ?

Evolution starts 4 other programs (at least) on start up.
evolution-mail, evolution-addressbook, evolution-calendar and
evolution-executive-summary. These all need loaded. That is why it is
slower to start up.

iain
-- 
"All men of conscience or prudence ply to windward, to maintain their
wars to be defensive." -- Roger Williams

_______________________________________________
gnome-devel-list mailing list
gnome-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devel-list