Re: Mono and GNOME. The long reply.
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: miguel ximian com (Miguel de Icaza)
- Cc: sergey oudaltsov clients ie (Sergey V. Udaltsov), gnome-hackers gnome org, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Mono and GNOME. The long reply.
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:10:38 -0500 (EST)
> Java byte codes are powerful enough that you can run anything on that.
> But a series of languages will be very hard to support efficiently (C,
> C++, Fortran in one end and Haskell and Lisp on the other one).
You can support C efficiently in Java byte code. Fortran even more so,
not that anyone in the fortran world would care[1]. Lisp is already available
efficiently on java, as is python and even cobol and APL.
> As I said, Microsoft took Java and went to language vendors and asked
> `What do you need me to add to make your work simpler'. And that turned
> out to be the CIL.
Which adds instructions that allow compilers to be written more easily at
a horrible cost in run time execution efficiency.
Alan
[1] Fortran programmers write code to do a job and do it fast and right.
The only portability issues they care about are numeric precision ones and
neither CIL nor the JVM addresses them
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]