Re: gnome (gconf) saga - please read
- From: "Timothy H. Keitt" <tklistaddr keittlab bio sunysb edu>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome (gconf) saga - please read
- Date: 04 Mar 2002 12:27:28 -0500
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 11:24, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> It's an idea, at least as a heuristic for whether to ask the user;
> it's less robust though. There are certainly situations where that
> would result in improper lock removal.
>
> The config corruption you see in ~/.gnome results from exactly the
> "well that situation will never happen" kind of thinking...
>
Agreed.
What made me think about it was the idea of NFS leasing (e.g.,
http://www.moshebar.com/article.php?sid=5), although that applies to
data caching, not locking. I wonder if it might be adaptable to file
locking.
Tim
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]