Re: Trivial patches on b.g.o covers dust.

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:12:06PM +0200, Ali Akcaagac wrote:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78903

This patch requires revision, as it says in the comments.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98589

Someone can feel free to commit this.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77134

This is quite hard to fix and there's no patch.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82062

Fine to commit this.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90294

This bug is closed, and a duplicate of one of the above.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90720

This is good to commit (a string change, is why it couldn't 
be done earlier).

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94887

Also good to commit.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106133

Yep

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108711

I reviewed this yesterday, it's pending a new patch.
Don't bug me about stuff that's 1 day old. ;-)

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109356

Fine to commit this, as it says in the comments.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110979

Needs more thought, there's discussion in the bug as to what sort of
thought. Also generally we need to add pref keyword to all pref 
requests on g-t and decide which prefs to add/remove

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110999

Needs more thought.

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107285

Not a bug, people need to kill off their Xft1.

Havoc