Re: Trivial patches on b.g.o covers dust.

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:41:25PM +0200, Waldgeist wrote: 
> I really agree with Ali here.. especially Nautilus seems to go on very 
> slowly (in important areas), in that case it is very dangerous to 
> frighten interested developers away with ignoring their patches by not 
> even say something about them.. (especially if the patches would clear 
> out issues that were mentioned by many users..)

You're going to help with bug days then, right?

For nautilus specifically see:
 http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2003-April/msg00046.html
 http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2003-April/msg00061.html

Help is needed, there's a limit to how much the maintainers can do.

Of course the *best* help would be to find new maintainers of specific
nautilus areas or other swamped modules. i.e. break up modules
further. Not clear where nautilus would naturally subdivide.

Havoc