Re: Binary Compatibility question
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Edwin <edwin bathysphere org>
- Cc: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Binary Compatibility question
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 22:42:58 +0000
Hi Edwin,
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 03:43, Edwin wrote:
> > Your original post did not really nail down what your problem was,
> > though. Was the rpm not installing because rpm wanted the liblinc.so
> > requirement to be satisfied, or were there runtime linking problems?
>
> Both. Since the executable's linked against liblinc, it needs to find it
> at runtime even if we won't be calling any functions in it, so ignoring
> the RPM warnings won't help.
The RPM shouldn't be requiring linc; and the app shouldn't be linking
against 'linc' directly either; it should just link against ORBit2,
which should pull in linc at link time (no pun intended).
That should work on Linux systems everywhere; failing that, requiring
the liblinc1 on Mdk may help (though as you say the app doesn't need/use
linc itself).
Either way - ABI/API compatibility is really important to us - so, no
you certainly shouldn't have to re-compile anything to make it run on a
later platform.
Hmm,
Michael.
--
michael ximian com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]