Re: Why file content sniffing sucks

On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 11:25, iain wrote:

> Hmmm, dunno, dunno, oh jpg...whoops, no, it was an executable trojan
> renamed to a jpg to trick me into running it.

What do you mean, "trick you into running it"?  If Nautilus detects it
as a JPEG due to the .jpg extension, it's not going to give you the
option to execute it as a binary.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]