Re: Qt for GNOME?

[Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>]

On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:36 +0200, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
> Several blogs reacted on the derStandard.at interview with Marc Shuttleworth, 
> who mentioned the possibility for GNOME-3.x to be based on the Qt framework.
> 
> First of all the relevant postings:
> 
> http://derstandard.at/?url=/?id=3413801
> http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/07/16/itwire-shuttleworth-has-some-nice-words-for-kde/
> http://www.j5live.com/2008/07/16/flames-welcome-is-a-qt-gnome-desirable
> 
> I think it's time to start a _serious_ discussion here, but please, pro's and 
> con's, no flaming and ranting without arguments. 

I don't see how different that is from random guy off the street saying
something about GNOME.  I mean, sure, he can afford putting a downstream
distro or a DVCS together, but setting direction for GNOME?  Kidding
me...

Ok, if that's not clear enough, if someone does that, they may as well
call it something else.

-- 
behdad
http://behdad.org/

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
 Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
        -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759