Re: changes to anjuta2

[jeroen <jeroen xs4all nl>]

Hi,

We're only going to rename anjuta_2_. The current anjuta(1) will remain
the same. The reason for doing this is that while anjuta2 is a totally
different codebase, using (almost) the same name as anjuta1 creates a lot
of confusion among users. See my earlier mail for a more detailed
explanation.

Jeroen

On 25 Jul 2003, arief_mulya wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I know I'm not an active developer here, I'm not even an active member,
> but I like anjuta(2), alot. And I like the romantism it brings in the
> name. Could we at least preserve this romantism in the new name.
>
> Don't get me wrong,
> I like scaffold name too,  but it does not quite feels like 'anjuta'.
>
> Sorry for bothering.
> Just my 2cents.
>
>
> Best Regards.
>
> --
> arief_mulya <arief bna telkomsel co id>
> Damai Itu Indah
>
>
> On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 06:03, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > Ok, that worked and some of the syntax highlighting came back :-)
> > Symbol browser doesn't seem to work but I never used it anyway.  I will
> > proceed on renaming.
> >
> > --
> > J5
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 03:40, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote:
> > > Hmm, did you do a completely new build? (make distclean or remove the
> > > dirs and check them out again).
> > >
> > > Are you getting any output in the terminal? (you shouldn't, i fixed all
> > > the warnings).
> > >
> > > Oh, i think i know what the problem is. The current code in glimmer uses
> > > the same name in it's XML file for the Preferences menuitem as anjuta2.
> > > You can fix that by applying the attached patch (not in cvs yet). Apply
> > > the patch in the glimmer/data directory (patch -p0 < ui.patch from the
> > > data directory)
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > Jeroen
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 01:43, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > > > Ok, I compiled everything and there seems to be some breakage here.  The
> > > > project manager doesn't load any projects, error output window does not
> > > > open up anymore and the only prefrence item is the editor prefs so I
> > > > can't even see what plugins are available.  Am I missing something?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > J5
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 15:27, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 02:46, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > > > > > Alright, you are the best.  I needed some good news right now after
> > > > > > writting a stance on the whole SCO/Caldera thing for my local LUG.
> > > > > > Should I start on the renaming or wait?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, i've committed the stuff i wanted to commit before the renaming
> > > > > could be done. Feel free to start renaming stuff to scaffold.
> > > > >
> > > > > A "scaffold" module needs to be created as well eventually in gnome cvs.
> > > > > I don't know how moving the stuff to this module works though (keeping
> > > > > the history etc). Perhaps some cvs admins can help with that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeroen
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > gnome-devtools mailing list
> > > > gnome-devtools gnome org
> > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
> > > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-devtools mailing list
> > gnome-devtools gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devtools mailing list
> gnome-devtools gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
>