Re: changes to anjuta2
- From: arief_mulya <arief bna telkomsel co id>
- To: gnome-devtools gnome org
- Subject: Re: changes to anjuta2
- Date: 25 Jul 2003 10:59:55 +0700
Dear all,
I know I'm not an active developer here, I'm not even an active member,
but I like anjuta(2), alot. And I like the romantism it brings in the
name. Could we at least preserve this romantism in the new name.
Don't get me wrong,
I like scaffold name too, but it does not quite feels like 'anjuta'.
Sorry for bothering.
Just my 2cents.
Best Regards.
--
arief_mulya <arief bna telkomsel co id>
Damai Itu Indah
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 06:03, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> Ok, that worked and some of the syntax highlighting came back :-)
> Symbol browser doesn't seem to work but I never used it anyway. I will
> proceed on renaming.
>
> --
> J5
>
> On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 03:40, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote:
> > Hmm, did you do a completely new build? (make distclean or remove the
> > dirs and check them out again).
> >
> > Are you getting any output in the terminal? (you shouldn't, i fixed all
> > the warnings).
> >
> > Oh, i think i know what the problem is. The current code in glimmer uses
> > the same name in it's XML file for the Preferences menuitem as anjuta2.
> > You can fix that by applying the attached patch (not in cvs yet). Apply
> > the patch in the glimmer/data directory (patch -p0 < ui.patch from the
> > data directory)
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Jeroen
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 01:43, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > > Ok, I compiled everything and there seems to be some breakage here. The
> > > project manager doesn't load any projects, error output window does not
> > > open up anymore and the only prefrence item is the editor prefs so I
> > > can't even see what plugins are available. Am I missing something?
> > >
> > > --
> > > J5
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 15:27, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 02:46, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > > > > Alright, you are the best. I needed some good news right now after
> > > > > writting a stance on the whole SCO/Caldera thing for my local LUG.
> > > > > Should I start on the renaming or wait?
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, i've committed the stuff i wanted to commit before the renaming
> > > > could be done. Feel free to start renaming stuff to scaffold.
> > > >
> > > > A "scaffold" module needs to be created as well eventually in gnome cvs.
> > > > I don't know how moving the stuff to this module works though (keeping
> > > > the history etc). Perhaps some cvs admins can help with that.
> > > >
> > > > Jeroen
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gnome-devtools mailing list
> > > gnome-devtools gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devtools mailing list
> gnome-devtools gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]