Re: GDP web site
- From: Dan Mueth <d-mueth uchicago edu>
- To: Thomas Canty <tommydal ihug com au>
- Cc: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GDP web site
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 09:56:12 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Thomas Canty wrote:
> I visited the GDP web site in order to found out how to write documentation for
> a couple of programs, and i thought the structure of the web site quite
> confusing.... For people starting out writing documentation, it's not clear enough what
> they need to read in order to know enough to starting documenting.
>
> It seems to be designed for people currently documenting, not those starting
> out on documentation. There is too much information on the one page to quickly
> find the information a newbie would be looking for.
>
> I think there should be a separate getting started section that details the
> basics of documenting for GNOME. ( On a separate page) The problem isn't with the
> information on the web site, but rather the way in it's presented that's
> confusing..
>
> Feel free to disagree with me :) - I am probably the exception rather than the
> rule.
>
> And maybe this will be fixed anyway when the Gnome web site is redesigned...
The layout will probably change rather substantially when the new site is
made. This is a good time to discuss what the problems are with the
current site and what we should change when we make the new site. I
imagine the new site will not try to squeeze everything into one page, but
will have a main page linking to a handful of other pages. It sounds like
we need a QuickStart page or a Newbies page.
I think the information you are looking for is in The GNOME Handbook of
Writing Software Documentation. Take a look at this document and tell us
what you think.
We have done a fair amount of work trying to make it easy for people to
learn how to write documentation (GDP web page, Handbook, dcm's new
gnome-doc-tools package, DocTable, active #docs group, document
templates, ...). Any suggestions on other things we can do to make
documenting easier or on how we can improve these existing tools would be
welcome.
Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]