Re: GNOME 1.1.90
- From: Jaka Mocnik <jaka mocnik kiss uni-lj si>
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- Cc: Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>, kenneth gnome dk,Jacob Berkman <jacob helixcode com>, gnome-hackers nuclecu unam mx,gnome-i18n nuclecu unam mx, gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 1.1.90
- Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 10:22:37 +0200
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Jaka Mocnik <jaka.mocnik@kiss.uni-lj.si> writes:
>
> > Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > >
> > > > > [stuff i forgot?!??]
> > > >
> > > > What about ggv, gnome-media, gtop or dia?
> > I'll do ggv.
> >
> > As far as the bonobo part goes, it should still use goad and not oaf,
> > right?
> >
>
> I am about to commit a ggv patch so it can use either goad or
> oaf. Same for xpdf.
that's nice, but as far as GNOME 1.2 goes, the binaries should be
compiled using GOAD, right?
jaKa
--
email: jaka.mocnik@kiss.uni-lj.si
w3: http://pluton.ijs.si/~jaka
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]