Re: GNOME 1.1.90

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>]

Jaka Mocnik <jaka.mocnik@kiss.uni-lj.si> writes:

> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> > 
> > Jaka Mocnik <jaka.mocnik@kiss.uni-lj.si> writes:
> > 
> > > Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > [stuff i forgot?!??]
> > > > >
> > > > > What about ggv, gnome-media, gtop or dia?
> > > I'll do ggv.
> > >
> > > As far as the bonobo part goes, it should still use goad and not oaf,
> > > right?
> > >
> > 
> > I am about to commit a ggv patch so it can use either goad or
> > oaf. Same for xpdf.
> that's nice, but as far as GNOME 1.2 goes, the binaries should be
> compiled using GOAD, right?
> 

Yes, you are right, OAF is not stable enough yet. However, Bonobo is
not part of the gnome 1.2 development platform so probably ggv should
be compiled w/o bonobo support and/or statically linked when
distributed.

 - Maciej