Re: Documenting Tomboy

[Alex Graveley <alex beatniksoftware com>]

All of this sounds fine to me.  Having the GDP own the documents makes 
the most sense.  I'll look into adding the bugzilla component.

-Alex

Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 01:06 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just added the gnome-doc-utils boilerplate to Tomboy CVS.  Please 
> > feel free to fix any bugs I've missed or to start contributing user 
> > manual content.
>
> Thanks Alex.  What we need to know is if the GDP has control
> over this document, or if you (or somebody else) will be the
> maintainer for the documentation.  Basically, do I and a few
> other senior GDP members have blanket commit privileges?
>
> Also, it would be great to have a bugzilla component for the
> documentation.  Most modules use "docs", but "documentation",
> "Documentation", and "help" are also common.  (I'm trying to
> think of a smart plan for these, but I haven't yet.)
>
> If and only if Tomboy's documentation is maintained by the
> GDP, then we'd like the default assignee of that component
> to be gnome-user-docs-maint gnome bugs   The default QA
> contact can be whatever you want.  Some maintainers use
> the -maint alias of their product so they can watch the
> documentation bugs.
>
> --
> Shaun