Re: GNOME 2.0 conversation

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Sam TH <sam uchicago edu> writes: 
> However, about GNOME 2.0, the board members, etc seemed to punt in the
> last discussion.  However, this issue does need to be moved forward in
> some way, if only to begin to develop criteria for determining the
> contents of GNOME office in GNOME 2.0.  
> 
> Hopefully the discussion can generate more light and less heat this
> time.  
>            

If you mean the GO vs. OpenOffice discussion, the board did make a
final decision to just include both and not worry about trying to
decide this issue for or against either suite in any way.

Havoc